famalaoan / lepblo siha / politiku


As a child, I read a series of books on famous American and European people — Louis Pasteur was one of them, and Margaret Mead was another.  Although Mead’s early work was focused on sexuality, I remember that the book skipped carefully around the topic and emphasized her interest in allowing children to develop and grow at their own pace.  The book on Pasteur, with a graphic illustration of the transmission of rabies from a dog to a child, was far more striking.

Mead had a storied career in anthropology and strong influence on generations of Americans.  She is still highly regarded today; Derek Freeman’s attempt to critique Mead’s methodology and what he described more or less as her gullibility has received fierce attacks.  What should primarily be critiqued, however — and has been critiqued from several different perspectives — is Mead’s problematic assumption that she could speak for Samoan culture, analyze Samoan culture, and represent Samoan culture.

Mead’s 1928 Coming of Age in Samoa — a sweeping study that became a popular bestseller — was based on a sample size of twenty-five “little girls” and a time period of only around nine months living in a couple of islands that are part of Samoa.  She was the quintessential blind outsider bowling into a society and presuming to understand it, criticize it, and use it for her own political ends.

Margaret Mead is often understood as exploring Samoan mores out of a desire to find a society that was sexually freer.  However, Coming of Age in Samoa contains statements that are profoundly homophobic: “Native [Samoan] theory and vocabulary recognised the real pervert who was incapable of normal heterosexual response.”

Coming of Age in Samoa shows no knowledge of the age-old Samoan tradition of the fa’afa’fine, which predates contact with Western culture.  Rather, Mead speaks of homosexual and intersex people in the same breath as those who have mental disorders.

I cannot take Coming of Age in Samoa seriously as an academic study.  It is irredeemably contaminated by a populist, unexamined, undefended aggregate of racist, colonialist, and homophobic obsessions, explicitly deployed.

These problems with Mead are systematic and endemic.  You can find a collection of even more reports on the renowned anthropologist at this blog, including links to critiques by Samoan people themselves.

Samoan novelist, artist, and professor Albert Wendt:

“We need to write, paint, sculpt, weave, dance, sing, and think ourselves into existence. For too long other people have done it for us – and they’ve usually stereotyped us, or created versions of us that embody their own hang-ups and beliefs and prejudices about us. So we have to write our own stories!”

I include that quote at the beginning of most literature syllabi I give my students.  I want them to have that attitude — not to wait for someone else to tell them what to think about themselves.


One thought on “Mead

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s